Matthew
2:3
When Herod the king had heard
these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.
a. NLT: King Herod was deeply
disturbed when he heard this, as was everyone in Jerusalem.
b. NIV: When King Herod heard this he
was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him.
c. Amplified Bible: When Herod the
king heard this, he was disturbed and troubled, and the whole
of Jerusalem with him.
d. Young’s Literal Translation: And
Herod the king having heard, was stirred, and all Jerusalem with him,
e. Worrell Translation: And the king
Herod, hearing it, was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him;
1. “When Herod the king had heard
these things, he was troubled…”
a. when [1161 * de] [Strong: a primary particle (adversative or
continuative); but, and, etc.:--also, and, but, moreover, now (often
unexpressed in English).]
b. Herod [2264 * Herodes] [Strong: compound
of heros (a "hero") and 1491; heroic; Herod, the name of four Jewish
kings:--Herod.]
c. king [935 * basileus] [Strong: probably
from 939 (through the notion of a foundation of power); a sovereign
(abstractly, relatively, or figuratively):--king.]
d. heard [191 * akouo] [Strong: a
primary verb; to hear (in various senses):--give (in the) audience (of), come
(to the ears), (shall) hear(-er, -ken), be noised, be reported, understand.]
e. troubled [5015 * tarasso][Thayer: to agitate, trouble (a thing, by the movement
of its parts to and fro) to cause one inward commotion, take away his calmness
of mind, disturb his equanimity, to disquiet, make restless, to stir up, to trouble, to strike one's
spirit with fear and dread, to render anxious or distressed, to perplex the
mind of one by suggesting scruples or doubts.
1). Herod was a very cruel and wicked
king and had fits of paranoia as well. He had his wife’s brother murdered and
three of his sons murdered. He was no doubt demon possessed and oppressed. Here,
he was troubled because he believed he would lose his kingdom and as he had
demonstrated in other examples, would go to any length to keep it.
2. “…and all Jerusalem with him.”
a. and [2532 * kai] [Strong: apparently,
a primary particle, having a copulative and sometimes also a cumulative force;
and, also, even, so then, too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition)
with other particles or small words:--and, also, both, but, even, for, if, or,
so, that, then, therefore, when, yet.]
b. all [3956 * pas] including all the forms of declension;
apparently a primary word; all, any, every, the whole:--all (manner of, means),
alway(-s), any (one), X daily, + ever, every (one, way), as many as, +
no(-thing), X thoroughly, whatsoever, whole, whosoever.]
c. Jerusalem [2414 * Hierosoluma] Strong: of Hebrew origin (3389);
Hierosolyma (i.e. Jerushalaim), the capitol of Palestine:--Jerusalem.]
d. with [3326 * meta] [Strong: a
primary preposition (often used adverbially); properly, denoting accompaniment;
"amid" (local or causal); modified variously according to the case
(genitive association, or accusative succession) with which it is joined;
occupying an intermediate position between 575 or 1537 and 1519 or 4314; less
intimate than 1722 and less close than 4862):--after(-ward), X that he again,
against, among, X and, + follow, hence, hereafter, in, of, (up-)on, + our, X
and setting, since, (un-)to, + together, when, with (+ -out). Often used in
composition, in substantially the same relations of participation or proximity,
and transfer or sequence.]
e. him [846 * autos] [Strong: from the
particle au (perhaps akin to the base of 109 through the idea of a baffling
wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative
1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other
persons:--her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same,
((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves),
there(-at, - by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this
(man), those, together, very, which.]
1). Alfred Edersheim, Life and Times of Jesus the
Messiah, Book 2, Chapter 8: “But the people of Jerusalem had far other reason
to fear. They knew only too well the character of Herod, and what the
consequences would be to them, or to any one who might be suspected, however
unjustly, of sympathy with any claimant to the royal throne of David.”
2). Edersheim adds, Their feelings on
this matter would be represented, by the expressions in the Sanhedrin, recorded
in John 11:47-50.
a). John 11:47-50 Then gathered the
chief priests and the Pharisees a council, and said, What do we? for this man
doeth many miracles.
11:48 If we let him thus alone, all
men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place
and nation.
11:49 And one of them, named Caiaphas,
being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all,
11:50 Nor consider that it is
expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole
nation perish not.
No comments:
Post a Comment