1 Corinthians 9:8
Say I these things as a man? or saith not
the law the same also?
a.
NLT: Am I expressing merely a human opinion, or does the law say the same
thing?
b.
NIV: Do I say this merely on human authority? Doesn’t the Law say the same
thing?
c.
YLT: According to man do I speak these things? or doth not also the law say
these things?
d.
Amplified Bible: Do I say this only on human authority and as
a man reasons? Does not the Law endorse the same principle?
e.
Worrell Translation: Do I speak these things after the manner of men? Or does not
the law also say the same?
1. “Say I these things as a man?...”
a.
Say I [2980 * laleo] [Strong: a prolonged form of an otherwise obsolete verb;
to talk, i.e. utter words:--preach, say, speak (after), talk, tell, utter.]
b.
these things [5023 * tauta] [Strong: nominative or accusative case neuter
plural of 3778; these things:--+ afterward, follow, + hereafter, X him, the
same, so, such, that, then, these, they, this, those, thus.]
c.
as [3361 * me] [Strong: a primary particle of qualified negation (whereas 3756
expresses an absolute denial); (adverb) not, (conjunction) lest; also (as an
interrogative implying a negative answer (whereas 3756 expects an affirmative
one)) whether:--any but (that), X forbear, + God forbid, + lack, lest, neither,
never, no (X wise in), none, nor, (can-)not, nothing, that not, un(-taken),
without. Often used in compounds in substantially the same relations.]
1). [2596 * kata] [Strong: a primary
particle; (prepositionally) down (in place or time), in varied relations (according
to the case (genitive, dative or accusative) with which it is joined):--about,
according as (to), after, against, (when they were) X alone, among, and, X
apart, (even, like) as (concerning, pertaining to touching), X aside, at,
before, beyond, by, to the charge of, (charita-)bly, concerning, + covered,
(dai-)ly, down, every, (+ far more) exceeding, X more excellent, for, from ...
to, godly, in(-asmuch, divers, every, -to, respect of), ... by, after the
manner of, + by any means, beyond (out of) measure, X mightily, more, X
natural, of (up-)on (X part), out (of every), over against, (+ your) X own, +
particularly, so, through(-oughout, -oughout every), thus, (un-)to(-gether,
-ward), X uttermost, where(-by), with. In composition it retains many of these
applications, and frequently denotes opposition, distribution, or intensity.
d.
a man [444* Anthropos] [Strong: from 435 and ops (the countenance; from 3700);
man-faced, i.e. a human being:--certain, man.]
2. “…or saith not the law the same also?”
e.
or [2228 e] [Strong: a primary particle
of distinction between two connected terms; disjunctive, or; comparative,
than:--and, but (either), (n-)either, except it be, (n-)or (else), rather,
save, than, that, what, yea. Often used in connection with other particles.]
f.
saith [3004 * lego] [Strong: a primary verb; properly, to “lay” forth, i.e.
(figuratively) relate (in words (usually of systematic or set discourse;
whereas 2036 and 5346 generally refer to an individual expression or speech
respectively; while 4483 is properly to break silence merely, and 2980 means an
extended or random harangue)); by implication, to mean:--ask, bid, boast, call,
describe, give out, name, put forth, say(-ing, on), shew, speak, tell, utter.]
g.
not [3780 * ouchi] [Strong: intensive of 3756; not indeed:--nay, not.]
h.
the law [3551 * nomos] [Strong: from a primary nemo (to parcel out, especially
food or grazing to animals); law (through the idea of prescriptive usage),
genitive case (regulation), specially, (of Moses (including the volume); also
of the Gospel), or figuratively (a principle):--law.]
i.
also [2532 * kai] [2532 * kai] [Strong: apparently, a primary particle, having
a copulative and sometimes also a cumulative force; and, also, even, so then,
too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition) with other particles or
small words:--and, also, both, but, even, for, if, or, so, that, then,
therefore, when, yet.]
1). Here Paul is clearly distinguishing
between mere human authority and the authority of the Scripture.
No comments:
Post a Comment