Luke 2:50
And they understood not the saying which he spake
unto them.
a. NLT: But they didn’t understand what he meant.
b. NIV: But they did not understand what he was
saying to them.
c. Young’s Literal Translation:
d. Amplified Bible: But they did not comprehend
what He was saying to them.
e. Worrell Translation: And they understood not
the saying that He spake to them.
1. “And they understood not the saying…”
a. And [2532 * kai] [Strong: apparently, a primary particle, having a
copulative and sometimes also a cumulative force; and, also, even, so then,
too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition) with other particles or
small words:--and, also, both, but, even, for, if, or, so, that, then,
therefore, when, yet.]
b. they [846 * autos] [Strong: [Strong: from the
particle au (perhaps akin to the base of 109 through the idea of a baffling
wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the comparative
1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun) of the other
persons:--her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said, (self-), the) same,
((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s), them(-selves),
there(-at, - by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these) things, this
(man), those, together, very, which.]
c. understood [4920 * suniemi] [Strong: from 4862
and hiemi (to send); to put together, i.e. (mentally) to comprehend; by
implication, to act piously:-- consider, understand, be wise.]
d. not [3756 * ou] [Strong: a primary word; the
absolute negative (compare 3361) adverb; no or not:--+ long, nay, neither,
never, no (X man), none, (can-)not, + nothing, + special, un(-worthy), when, +
without, + yet but.]
e. [4487 * rhema] [Strong: from 4483; an
utterance (individually, collectively or specially),; by implication, a matter
or topic (especially of narration, command or dispute); with a negative naught
whatever:--+ evil, + nothing, saying, word.]
1). Because this is the Greek word “rhema”, there
needs to be some additional information given here.
a). [Zodhiates: That which is spoken, a
statement, word.] [W.E. Vine: “The
significance of rhema (as distinct from logos) is exemplified in the injunction
to take “the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God,” Ephesians 6:17;
here the reference is not to the whole Bible as such, but to the individual
scripture which the Spirit brings to our remembrance for use in time of need, a
prerequisite being the regular storing of the mind with Scripture.”]
b). Dr. Charles Farah, Jr. Professor of Theology
at ORU [This reference is from the 1980’s]: The Logos tends to be universal,
while the Rhema is often used as a
particular…the Logos is eternal, while the Rhema is often contemporary…It is a
word a man takes action on; a personal word he hears…”The word is nigh thee,
even in thy mouth, and in thy heart…” Romans 10:8. Here the word Rhema is used,
and I believe, though not all scholars would agree, that Paul is saying this:
Because the word is in your heart, it is necessary to use the word Rhema rather
than the Logos, because God’s word has become a personal word to you.
c). Advanced Training Institute: There are two primary Greek words that
describe Scripture which are translated word in the New
Testament. The first, logos, refers principally to the total inspired Word of God and to
Jesus, Who is the living Logos… The second primary Greek word that
describes Scripture is rhema, which refers to a word that is spoken
and means “an utterance.” A rhema
is a verse or portion of Scripture that the Holy Spirit brings to our attention
with application to a current situation or need for direction.
d). Don Costello: Hearing
logos requires physical ears, hearing
rhema requires spiritual ears.
Hearing logos produces knowledge,
while rhema produces revelation,
faith and grace. The literal meaning of Romans 10:17: faith comes from hearing
faith, we hear faith when we hear the rhema
of God. A logos word can become a rhema word through prayer and meditation
and confession. See notes on Joshua 1:8 and Proverbs 4:20-22. If a believer
desires any benefit from the logos
word, that is, principally to the total inspired Word of God, it must become rhema.
2. “…which
he spake unto them.”
a. which [3779
* houtos] [Strong: or (before a vowel houtos
hoo'-toce adverb from 3778; in this way (referring to what precedes or
follows):--after that, after (in) this manner, as, even (so), for all that,
like(-wise), no more, on this fashion(-wise), so (in like manner), thus, what.]
b. he spake [2980 * laleo] [Strong: a prolonged
form of an otherwise obsolete verb; to talk, i.e. utter words:--preach, say,
speak (after), talk, tell, utter.]
c. them [846 * autos] [Strong: [Strong:
from the particle au (perhaps akin to the base of 109 through the idea of a
baffling wind) (backward); the reflexive pronoun self, used (alone or in the
comparative 1438) of the third person , and (with the proper personal pronoun)
of the other persons:--her, it(-self), one, the other, (mine) own, said,
(self-), the) same, ((him-, my-, thy- )self, (your-)selves, she, that, their(-s),
them(-selves), there(-at, - by, -in, -into, -of, -on, -with), they, (these)
things, this (man), those, together, very, which.]
No comments:
Post a Comment